1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
Previous Step
Next Step

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Article

Formal Examination of Trademarks in South Africa: Understanding Legislative Requirements

March 12, 2025
Introduction

The formal examination of trademarks is an essential process to ensure that trademarks are not only unique and distinctive but also compliant with the various pieces of legislation governing specific industries. The laws outlined above protect consumers by ensuring that only licensed and authorized entities can use certain terms in their trademarks, maintaining the integrity of regulated sectors such as banking, insurance, alcohol, pharmaceuticals, and financial services.

Applicants seeking to register trademarks in these specialized sectors must be prepared to demonstrate compliance with the relevant legislation, providing proof of authorization where required. By adhering to these legislative requirements, businesses can ensure that their trademarks are legally sound and that they operate within the boundaries of South African law.

Below are some of the key Acts that are considered for the purposes of trademark examination in South Africa.

Banks Act 9 of 1990

The use of the word “bank” in a trademark is highly regulated due to the nature of banking services. According to the Banks Act, a business cannot use the term "bank" in its trademark unless it is licensed as a bank or authorized to operate as such by the South African Reserve Bank (SARB). Any applicant seeking to use "bank" in their trademark must first obtain permission from the Reserve Bank, which ensures that only licensed banking entities are permitted to operate under the protected designation.

Insurance Act 18 of 2017

In the insurance industry, trademarks that feature terms such as “assure,” “insure,” or “underwrite” must comply with the Insurance Act. Specifically, these terms may only be used if the applicant is a licensed insurer and has received approval from the Prudential Authority. This regulation prevents unlicensed entities from misleading consumers or claiming to offer insurance services without proper authorization.

Liquor Products Act 60 of 1989

For trademarks in Class 33 (alcoholic beverages), the Liquor Products Act mandates that any application must be reviewed in consultation with the Wine and Spirits Board. This ensures that the trademark complies with the legal regulations governing the production, sale, and marketing of alcoholic products. Examiners will consider any feedback provided by the board during the examination process to ensure full compliance.

Financial Services Board Act 97 of 1990

Trademarks that include references to the “Financial Services Board” or the term “financial services board” must obtain written permission from the Financial Services Board. The act regulates the use of such terms to prevent unauthorized entities from misleading consumers about their relationship with the regulatory body.

Financial Markets Act 19 of 2012

The Financial Markets Act is another piece of legislation that plays a role in the trademark examination process. Any trademark that incorporates the words “exchange” or “securities” must be authorized by the Registrar of Securities Services. If the applicant is not licensed or authorized under this act, they must seek approval from the Registrar to use such terms in their trademark. This regulation aims to ensure that only legitimate financial market entities use these terms, protecting consumers from potential fraud or confusion.

Medical Schemes Act 131 of 1998

The use of the phrase “medical scheme” in a trademark is strictly prohibited unless the business is registered as a medical scheme under the Medical Schemes Act. This regulation safeguards consumers and ensures that only legitimate, registered medical schemes can use such terminology in their branding. Trademarks using this phrase must undergo careful scrutiny to prevent unauthorized claims in the healthcare sector.

Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956

Similar to the Medical Schemes Act, the Pension Funds Act prohibits the use of the term “pension fund” or similar terms in a trademark unless the business is provisionally or finally registered as a pension fund. This ensures that consumers are not misled into believing they are dealing with an authorized pension fund provider unless the entity has met the regulatory requirements set forth in the Pension Funds Act.

Medicines and Related Substances Control Act 101 of 1965

In the pharmaceutical sector, trademarks that fall under Class 5 (pharmaceuticals) must be examined in light of the Medicines and Related Substances Control Act. During the examination, the Medicines Control Council may be consulted to ensure that the trademark complies with the council’s regulations. This ensures that the products associated with such trademarks meet the necessary standards for safety, efficacy, and quality.

Merchandise Marks Act 17 of 1941

The Merchandise Marks Act restricts the use of certain symbols or marks in trademarks. For instance, the national flag of South Africa cannot be used in a trademark without specific authorization. Additionally, the Minister may issue prohibitions on certain symbols or marks, which examiners must take into account when reviewing trademark applications. This law ensures that trademarks do not misuse national symbols or mislead the public.

Conclusion

The formal examination of trademarks is an essential process to ensure that trademarks are not only unique and distinctive but also compliant with the various pieces of legislation governing specific industries. The laws outlined above protect consumers by ensuring that only licensed and authorized entities can use certain terms in their trademarks, maintaining the integrity of regulated sectors such as banking, insurance, alcohol, pharmaceuticals, and financial services.
Applicants seeking to register trademarks in these specialized sectors must be prepared to demonstrate compliance with the relevant legislation, providing proof of authorization where required. By adhering to these legislative requirements, businesses can ensure that their trademarks are legally sound and that they operate within the boundaries of South African law.

Reference

South African Trademark Office. Guideline on the Examination of Trade Marks.
Budaza & Mashifane inc

Our Company is a boutique law firm based in South Africa, specializing in intellectual property law....

Book a one-hour consultation for free..!